Ritesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16779 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-125 Year-2018 Thana- TEKARI District- Gaya ====================================================== RITESH KUMAR Son of Manoj Kumar, Resident of Village - Bhori, P.S.- Tekari, Distt - Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dinesh Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 26-03-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Tekari P.S. Case No. 125 of 2018 registered for offence punishable under sections 147, 148, 149, 504, 506, 324, 326(A), 307, 364, 379 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.

Allegation has been made that Ranjay Sharma and Navin Kumar have poured the water like liquid which was battery water on the body of the victim caused burn to his body. He was admitted in the hospital. Allegation has been made against the accused persons caught and Navin Kumar and Ranjay Sharma poured the battery water on the person of the victim.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16779 of 2019(2) dt.26-03-2019 2/3 The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that co-accused Navin Kumar and Ranjay Sharma have already been granted bail by one of the coordinate Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 56092 of 2018.

In such view of the matter, there is no other way but to grant bail to the petitioner and accordingly his prayer for bail is allowed and he, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from today, is directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VI, Gaya in connection with Tekari P.S. Case No. 125 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438 Cr. PC and also subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court. If the petitioner is found involved in similar type of allegation in future, the prosecution will have liberty to file an application for cancellation of his bail bond.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16779 of 2019(2) dt.26-03-2019 3/3 the petitioner for the purpose of interrogation/investigation, he would present himself, In case of failure, the prosecution will have liberty to make a prayer for cancellation of his bail before the court below.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) mkchy/- U T