Roushan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17175 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-476 Year-2024 Thana- DEHRI TOWN District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.
Roushan Kumar Son of Manoj Kumar Resident of Paschimi (West) Mohan Bigha Dehri on sone PS -Dehri District- Rohtas 2.
Meera Devi @ Meera Kumari Wife of Manoj Kumar Resident of Paschimi (West) Mohan Bigha Dehri on sone PS -Dehri District- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rakesh Singh, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ramesh Chandra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 127(1), 115(2), 75, 351(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3. It is alleged that on 01.07.2024 at about 5 PM, while informant's daughter was going for tuition, on way, petitioner no.1 misbehaved with her and inappropriately touched her, whereas petitioner no. 2 passed comments on her. It is further alleged that when informant's daughter told the incident to her mother, she (informant) went to the house of petitioners to make complaint, where she was assaulted by petitioners.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. As a
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17175 of 2025(2) dt.07-04-2025 2/2 matter of fact, on 04.07.2024, petitioner no. 2 lodged an F.I.R., vide Dehri SC/ST P.S. Case No. 40/2024, under the provision of SC/ST Act and B.N.S. against the prosecution party (Annexure2) and in retaliation, this false and concocted case been lodged. As per F.I.R., the alleged occurrence took place on 01.07.2024, but the F.I.R. has been lodged on 08.07.2024 and there is no plausible explanation of delay. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Dehri, District - Rohtas in connection with Dehri Town P.S. Case No. 476 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T