Purushottam Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.54382 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -144 Year- 2014 Thana -CHAUSA District- MADHEPURA ======================================================

1. Purushottam Singh Son of Pramod Singh, R/o Village- Bhawanpura, P.S.- Kharik, District- Bhagalpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Satyavarat Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 16-11-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Chausa P.S.Case No.144 of 2014 registered for offences punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Allegation against the petitioner and other accused persons is of assaulting the deceased causing his death. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner and other co-accused persons and on that basis the petitioner has been granted bail by this Court, vide order dated 25.2.106 passed in Cr. Misc. No.6563 of 2016 and order dated 8.9.2016 passed in Cr.Msic.No.37427 of 2016.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54382 of 2017 (2) dt.16-11-2017 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P. also, who has opposed the prayer for bail as he has surrendered after three years of the occurrence though he is named in the FIR.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Uda-Kishunganj, Madhepura in connection with Chausa P.S.Case No.144 of 2014. With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T