← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./24986/2016disposed

Raj Kumar Ranjan And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2020-02-27Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24986 of 2016 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-196 Year-2015 Thana- MADHEPURA COMPALINT CASE District- Madhepura ======================================================

1. Raj Kumar Ranjan, son of Brajbihari Yadav, resident of village Uda Kishunganj, College Chawk, Police Station- Uda Kishunganj, DistrictMadhepura.

2. Raman Yadav, son of Brajbihari Yadav

3. Brajbihari Yadav, son of Late Bandelal Yadav

4. Manju Devi, wife of Raman Yadav All three resident of village Maheshwa, P.S.- Uda Kishunganj, DistrictMadhepura. ... ... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. Swati Kumari, wife of Raj Kumar Ranjan, D/o- Chandra Shekhar Yadav, resident of village Maheshua, Uda Kishunganj, District- Madhepura. At present Address- Swati Kumari, D/o- Chandra Shekhar Yadav, resident of village Fulaut, Chawk, Rambagh, Uda Kishunganj, P.S.- Uda Kishunganj, District- Madhepura.

... ... Opposite Partyies ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shekhar Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Renu Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

The present application has been filed for quashing of order dated 14.12.2015 passed by Sri J.K. Kashyap, Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura in connection with Complaint Case No. 196/2015 whereby and whereunder the Court below has found the case to be prima facie true for an offence under Section 498A IPC and had issued process against the accused persons. After some arguments, learned counsel for the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24986 of 2016(4) dt.27-02-2020 2/2 petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this application with liberty to raise their defence at the time of framing of charge.

Permission is accorded.

The present application stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. It will be open to either of the parties to make application before the Court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Centre for reconciliation or one time settlement. The parties will be at liberty to approach the Family Court with competent jurisdiction for the redressal of their grievance.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T