← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./33029/2021disposed

Manish Singh @ Manish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2021-06-15Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33029 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-313 Year-2019 Thana- MANIYARI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== MANISH SINGH @ MANISH KUMAR Son of Rameshwar Singh @ Ramishwar Singh Resident of Village - Balra Kishun, P.S.- Maniyari, Distt.- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anuj Kumar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Bilash Roy Raman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 15-06-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is of recovery of 584.100 ml litre of illicit liquor from the poultry farm and goat farm of the petitioner. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case due to animosity. The poultry farm and goat farm are joint family property of the petitioner and other co-sharer. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 22.01.2021. Considering the fact that illicit liquor has been recovered from the poultry farm and goat farm of petitioner, I am

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33029 of 2021(2) dt.15-06-2021 2/2 not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage. However, it is observed that petitioner be released on bail after completing 6 months of jail custody upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Maniyari PS Case No. 313 of 2019, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(4). If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offence, after his/her release on bail, the trial court shall take steps to cancel his/her bail bonds. (S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U