← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./15450/2020bail granted

Vicky @ Bikram Choudhary @ Vikram Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2020-03-03Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15450 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-16 Year-2020 Thana- SULTANGANJ District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== VICKY @ BIKRAM CHOUDHARY @ VIKRAM CHOUDHARY, aged about 29 years, Gender-Male, S/o Ramdeo Choudhary @ Ramdev Choudhary, Resident of Village-Sabji Market, Thana Road, P.S.-Sultanganj, District-Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Tarun Prasad Mandal, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party :

Mr.Ram Sumiran Rai, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-03-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case for the offence registered under Sections 276, 419, 420 of the IPC, 18(A), 18(B), 18 (C), 27(b)(II), 28 and 28(A) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that the informant got knowledge from S.H.O. P.S. Sultanganj that Vikram Choudhary @ Vicky (petitioner) is selling restricted medicines secretly. He alongwith patrolling party reached at his shop where in presence of two independent witnesses, it was searched and recovered a total of 72 glass bottles filled with restricted syrups.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15450 of 2020(2) dt.03-03-2020 2/2 It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is languishing in custody since 29.01.2020. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. He has falsely been implicated in the present case. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. 72 bottles syrup is said to have been recovered from the shop of the petitioner. There is no compliance of Section 100 of Cr. P.C.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-Ist-cum-Special Judge, Bhagalpur, in connection with Drugs and Cosmetics Case No. 01 of 2020, arising out of Sultanganj P.S. Case No. 16 of 2020.

(Sudhir Singh, J) U.K./- U T