Patna High CourtCR. MISC./46624/2018bail granted

Dinanath Yadav And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2018-08-25Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.46624 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -20 Year- 2018 Thana -KINJAR District- JEHANABAD ======================================================

1. Dinanath Yadav Son of late Mosafir Yadav

2. Sompeyariya Devi W/o Dinanath Yadav Both R/o Village Tekari,P.S. Kinjar, Distt. Arwal.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Birendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Bisheshwar Ram ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 25-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Kinjar P.S. Case No. 20/2018, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 304(B) and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are father-in-law and mother-in-law respectively of the deceased. Husband of deceased is already in custody. There is general and omnibus allegation against these petitioners. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Kinjar P.S. Case No.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46624 of 2018 (2) dt.25-08-2018 2/2 20/2018, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Arwal, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and

(3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

(Sanjay Priya, J.) Rakhi U T