Mokhtar @ Ifjal Ahmad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8991 of 2015 ====================================================== Mokhtar @ Ifjal Ahmad, son of Qusim Khan, resident of Mohalla Srinagar, PS K Nagar, PO Srinagar, District Purnea ....... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna
2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resource Development, Govt. of Bihar, Patna
3. The Chairman, Bihar Combined Entrance Competitive Examination Board, IAS Association, Near Patna Airport, PO B V College, District Patna
4. The Controller of Examination, Bihar Combined Entrance Competitive Examination Board, IAS Association, Near Patna Airport, PO B V College, District Patna ... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jagjit Roshan For the Respondent/s : Mr. Lalit Kishore, PAAG ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 29-06-2015 This writ petition is filed in public interest with a prayer to quash the result of the examination of first phase of the Bihar Combined Entrance Competitive Examination, 2015 conducted on 19.4.2015.
The petitioner contends that several irregularities have taken place in the examination and results thereof do not reflect the actual performance.
Patna High Court CWJC No.8991 of 2015 (2) dt.29-06-2015 2/2 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.
The petitioner does not have anything to do with the examination. He is not the one who has participated in the same. It is only when a student, who has participated in the examination, approaches this Court and pleads that he suffered detriment on account of any acts of omission or commission on the part of the authorities, that it can consider the feasibility of examining the matter. A person who is totally unconnected with the examination cannot be permitted to seek the relief of quashing the entire result, which would affect the career of thousands of students.
We, therefore, dismiss the writ petition.
(L. Narasimha Reddy,CJ) (Sudhir Singh, J) mrl U