← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./16880/2026bail granted

Md. Nizamuddin @ Md. Nizamuddin Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

2026-03-25Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16880 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-204 Year-2025 Thana- LAUKAHI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Md. Nizamuddin @ Md. Nizamuddin Ansari S/o Allauddin Ansari @ Md. Allauddin Ansari R/o Village - Godhanpur, P.S - Jhanjharpur, District - Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jitendra Kumar Bharti For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar No. 2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 25-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Laukahi P.S. Case No.204 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections 274, 275 BNS, 2023.

3. As per prosecution case, there is recovery of 756 liters Sofi Nepali countrymade liquor from motorcycle.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence and he has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner has not been apprehended on the spot and nothing was recovered from the conscious physical possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16880 of 2026(2) dt.25-03-2026 2/2 for the petitioner next submits that petitioner has been implicated simply because he is the owner of the vehicle.

5. The learned APP opposes the anticipatory bail application.

6. Considering the fact that the petitioner has not been apprehended on the spot and therefore, nothing was recovered from the conscious physical possession of the petitioner and he appears to have been implicated simply because he is the owner of the vehicle, this Court is inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on anticipatory bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Excise Act, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani in connection with Laukahi P.S. Case No.204 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. (Alok Kumar Sinha, J) Prakash Narayan U T