Jagu Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18208 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-933 Year-2021 Thana- TURKAULIYA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Jagu Sahani S/O Bhawan Sahani R/O Village- Kawalpur, Ward No. 11, P.S.- Turkaulia, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajeev Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Arvind Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 05-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the prayer portion of the bail application Turkaulia P.S. Case No. 80 of 2022 has been wrongly mentioned in place of Turkaulia P.S. Case No. 933 of 2021.

Let it be so corrected and read accordingly.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a), 32, 41(i) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18208 of 2022(2) dt.05-08-2022 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is no recovery from the conscious possession of the petitioner rather eight liters of country made liquor and other utensils are said to have recovered from the house of the petitioner which is joint family property. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application.

Considering the fact that the recovery has been made from the house of the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected in connection with Turkaulia P.S. Case No. 933 of 2021.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T