Vijay Mushar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.62433 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -119 Year- 2017 Thana -GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ======================================================

1. Vijay Mushar, Son of Hari Lal Mushar, resident of Village- Belatadi Done, Gobarahiya, Police Station- Gobarahiya, District- West Champaran (Bihar).

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Suresh Prasad Sharma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Sanjay Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-01-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in I.F. No. 119 of 2017 registered for the offence under Sections 9, 27, 29, 30, 31, 39, 44, 49, 51(C) of Wild Life Protection Act.

Allegation as per the F.I.R. is that the informant received secret information that some persons have entered in the forest along with praying dog, armed with Bhala and Barchi for hunting of wild animals. From the place of occurrence petitioner was arrested.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that, accused petitioner is a labourer and has no concern with the crime and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. The

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.62433 of 2017 (3) dt.11-01-2018 2/2 petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 31.08.2017.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Bagaha, West Champaran in I.F. No. 119 of 2017, subject to the conditions that (1) one of the bailors must be local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court. (2) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence. (3) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) AnilKrSinha/- U