Dinesh Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18761 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-64 Year-2022 Thana- AHIYAPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Dinesh Ram Son of Late Nepali Ram Resident of village- Kolhua Paigamberpur Purani Motihari Road, P.S.- Ahiyapur, District - Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Bela Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shahabuddin Azeem @ S. Azeem, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 08-07-2022 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 64 of 2022 registered for the offence under Section 290 of Indian Penal Code and Sections 30(a) and 36 of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

The accused/petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and is in custody since 28.01.2022.

The allegation against the petitioner is to involve in the illegal business of illicit liquor, where 37.245 liters of liquor was recovered from the house of the petitioner. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18761 of 2022(2) dt.08-07-2022 2/3 submitted that recovery has been made from the house of the petitioner which is jointly occupied by other family members. It is submitted that recovery is not from the conscious physical possession of the petitioner. It is pointed out that petitioner is involved in one more criminal case, in which he is on bail. While concluding the argument, it is submitted that investigation in this case is complete for which chargesheet has been submitted, as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.

Learned APP appearing on behalf of the State while opposing the prayer of bail fairly conceded that recovery is from joint house of the petitioner.

Considering the facts and circumstances as mentioned above, as recovery is not from the conscious physical possession of the petitioner coupled with the fact that chargesheet has already been submitted, let the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 64 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise Court No.1, Muzaffarpur, subject to the following conditions: "(i) That accused/petitioner shall

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18761 of 2022(2) dt.08-07-2022 3/3 not involve in the similar nature of offence till the conclusion of trial, failing which the State shall be at liberty to move before the Trial Court itself for the cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.

(ii) Accused/Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be physically present on each and every date before the Trial Court till conclusion of the trial and exemption from physical appearance be allowed by the Trial Court, only on medical ground of the petitioner, duly supported by the documents.

(iii) That one of the bailors shall be Sarita Devi, who is the wife of the petitioner and deponent of the present bail petition."

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) Ankit/- U T