Md. Jamil Akhtar @ Jamal @ Jamil Akhtar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.44586 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -124 Year- 2017 Thana -AWADPUR District- KATIHAR ====================================================== Md. Jamil Akhtar @ Jamal @ Jamil Akhtar, Son of Md. Shohrab Mallah @ Shohreb Mallah, Resident of Village- Kazitola Shohjana, Police StationAzamnagar, District- Katihar. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abdul Wadood, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Atul Chandra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 13-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner is in custody since 30.10.2017 in connection with Abadpur P. S. Case No. 124 of 2017 for the offence registered under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no recovery from the petitioner and till date, he has not been placed on T.I. Parade. It is further submitted that only on the basis of suspicion, the petitioner has been implicated in this case. Petitioner is said to have several antecedent. Considering the fact that there is no recovery from the petitioner and he has been in custody since long, let the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44586 of 2018 (2) dt.13-08-2018 2/2 petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Smt. Jay Shri Kumari, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Katihar in connection with Abadpur P.S. Case No.124 of 2017, subject to the following conditions :-

(1) One of the bailors will be his father.

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of his failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) N.H./- Rajeev U T