Patna High CourtCR. MISC./53373/2017rejected

Munilal Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2017-12-06Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.53373 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -270 Year- 2015 Thana -RAJAUN District- BANKA ====================================================== Munilal Singh Son of late Parmeshwar Singh Resident of Village- Nawada Bazar, P.S. Rajoun, District Banka.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Kumar Dharmendra Narayan, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Srendra Kumar(APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 06-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew the prayer of bail which was earlier rejected vide order dated 13.07.2016 passed in Cri. Misc. No. 22938 of 2016, on the ground that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 20.01.2016. The prosecution version appears not probable and reliable, due to land dispute the occurrence has taken place. There is a case and counter case, no offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code is made out and, as such, the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration.

The learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer of bail by submitting that the petitioner is the assailant.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.53373 of 2017 (2) dt.06-12-2017 2/2 In the facts and circumstances stated above, finding no good ground for reconsideration of prayer of the bail, again prayer of the bail of the petitioner stands rejected in connection with Sessions Trial No. 103 of 2016 (Arising out of Rajoun P.S. Case No. 270 of 2015) pending in the court of learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Banka.

However, the learned trail Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same preferably within nine months, failing which if the petitioner at no fault, may be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rajiv/- U T