Md. Isa Bedil v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.62695 of 2017 (2) dt.11-01-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.62695 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -152 Year- 2016 Thana -KHODABANDPUR District- BEGUSARAI ======================================================

1. Md. Isa Bedil, Son of Late Sheikh Bhola @ Late Hazi Sheikh Bhola Hussain, Resident of Village- Amari, P.S.- Khodawandpur (Chhaurahi O.P.), District- Begusarai.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Nazir Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-01-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in Khodawandpur P.S. Case No. 152 of 2016 registered for the offence under Sections 467, 468, 420 of the I.P.C.

Allegation against the petitioner is of appointing the other accused on the basis of forged certificate. During that period he was Mukhiya of Gram Panchayat.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that in any manner the petitioner is not beneficiary and he has not taken a single money of the Government rather petitioner has no liability and duty to verify the genuineness of the educational certificates. He is aged about 77 years as per his Voter I.D. Card and he is in custody for about three months. Charge-sheet has been

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.62695 of 2017 (2) dt.11-01-2018 submitted.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Manjhaul, Begusarai in Khodawandpur P.S. Case No. 152 of 2016, subject to the conditions that (1) one of the bailors must be local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court. (2) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(3) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) AnilKrSinha/- U