← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/2055/2012disposed

Prem Lata Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-11-09Mr. Justice Ashwani Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2055 of 2012 ====================================================== Prem Lata Devi, wife of late Jang Bahadur Singh, resident of villageLohanda, P.S. Sikandra, District Jamui, At Present Pankaj Kumar, son of Vimal Singh, At +P.O.- Puari, P.S. Harnaut, District Nalanda. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna-15

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar,New Secretariat, Patna-15

3. The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar,Vikas Bhawan, New Secretariat, Patna-15

4. The District Magistrate, Jamui.

5. The District Provident Fund Officer, Munger.

6. The District Programme Officer,Jamui. null null

7. The District Programme Officer, Munger.

8. The Accountant General, Bihar, Birchand Patel Path, Patna.

9. The Head Master, Govt. Middle School Sikandara, Distt. Jamui.

10. The Treasury Officer, Jamui.

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Amaresh Kumar Sinha, A.C. to G.A.-I For the Accountant General, Respondent-8 : Mrs. Namrata Mishra, Advocate. For the Intervener Respondent: Mr. P.N. Shahi, Sr. Advovate. Mr. Sanjeet Kr. Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

Patna High Court CWJC No.2055 of 2012 (13) dt.09-11-2016 2/2 09-11-2016 At the outset, Mr. Pramod Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the grievances of the petitioner have already been redressed, the petitioner does not intend to press the application.

Learned counsel for the State raises no objection to the prayer of withdrawal of the application made on behalf of the petitioner.

In that view of the matter, the application is disposed of as withdrawn.

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) S.Ali/- U T