Patna High CourtCWJC/14316/2016disposed

Punit Rai v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-06-21Mr. Justice Ashwani Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14316 of 2016 ====================================================== Punit Rai son of Late Mahendra Rai Resident of Village - Khaira, P.O. - Jaitpur, P.S. Saraiya, District - Muzaffarpur, the retired Assistant Teacher, Nationalized Middle School, Sirkohiya (Boys), Block -Saraiya, District - Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna

4. The Director, Administration, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5. The District Education Officer, Muzaffarpur, District - Muzaffarpur.

6. The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Muzaffarpur, District - Muzaffarpur.

7. The District Provident Fund Officer, Muzaffarpur, District - Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Jitendra Kr. Roy No. 1- Sc13 Mr. Virendra Kuar, AC to SC-13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-06-2017 The present writ application has been filed for a direction upon the respondents to pay the petitioner the provident fund amount with up to date interest. A counter-affidavit has been filed on behalf of

Patna High Court CWJC No.14316 of 2016 (4) dt.21-06-2017 2/2 respondent nos. 2 and 3 wherein it has been stated that after getting instructions from the Directorate, GPF Bihar, Patna, two authority slips; one amounting to Rs.4,81,254/- and the other amounting to Rs.1,11,419/- have been issued on 11.05.2017 and 31.05.2017 respectively after calculating up to date statutory interest over the GPF amount and the entire amount of provident fund has been paid to the petitioner by the drawing and disbursing officer.

In view of the submission made in paragraphs 11 to 13 of the counter-affidavit, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that since the grievances of the petitioner have been redressed, the writ application may be disposed of. In that view of the matter, the writ application is disposed of.

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.) Kanchan/- U