Ganauri Rikyasan @ Ganauri Rikisiyan @ Ganauri Bhuiya v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17121 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-655 Year-2024 Thana- RAFIGANJ District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Ganauri Rikyasan @ Ganauri Rikisiyan @ Ganauri Bhuiya S/O Late Jagdish Manjhi R/O Village- Mohanpur Bigha, P.S- Rafiganj, Distt.- Aurangabad (Bihar).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar 2.

Kiran Devi W/O Deepak Chauhan R/O Village- Mohanpur bigha, P.SRafiganj, Dist.- Aurangabad. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Aman Vishal, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shantanu Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Rafiganj P.S. Case No. 655 of 2024 dated 09.11.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 74, 75, 76, 115(2), 126(2), 352, 351(2) of the B.N.S. and u/ss 8 and 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act and Section 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is alleged to have lured the three girls on promise to give them money where he stripped and molested them. On being objected

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17121 of 2025(2) dt.08-04-2025 2/3 by the informant, the petitioner abused the informant in state of intoxication and also threatened to kill him.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner has been made accused in this case merely on suspicion. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged offence. Learned counsel has further submitted that the charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 10.11.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Aurangabad in connection with Rafignaj P.S. Case No. 655 of 2024 with the condition :- (i) The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17121 of 2025(2) dt.08-04-2025 3/3 on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T