Preetam Kumar Sharma @ Pritam Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29782 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-635 Year-2020 Thana- ARARIA District- Araria ====================================================== 1.
PREETAM KUMAR SHARMA @ PRITAM KUMAR Son of Kailash Sharma Resident of Village - Islamnagar Ward No. 26, Police Station and District - Araria.
2.
Mayanand Mandal @ Maya Babu Son of Late Junak Lal Mandal Resident of Village - Islamnagar Ward No. 26, Police Station and District - Araria. 3.
Pawan Kumar @ Pawan Son of Mayanand Mandal Resident of Village - Islamnagar Ward No. 26, Police Station and District - Araria. 4.
Neelam Devi Wife of Mayanand Mandal Resident of Village - Islamnagar Ward No. 26, Police Station and District - Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Yogesh Chandra Verma, Sr. Adv Mr. Mukesh Kumar Rana, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Umeshanad Pandit, APP Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Adv ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 25-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks of resumption of normal court proceedings. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within stipulated period, office will place the matter before the Bench. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application. Permission is granted.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29782 of 2021(3) dt.25-07-2022 2/2 Accordingly, the instant application is dismissed as withdrawn.
However, petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned Court below and seek regular bail and the learned Court below would pass the order, preferably, on the same day, in accordance with law, considering the fact that there is no specific overt act against the petitioner no.3. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T