Lakki Das @ Ankit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18599 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2021 Thana- BAGHA District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1.

LAKKI DAS @ ANKIT KUMAR S/o Sri Hargun Das Resident of VillageSingha Chhapar, P.S.- Bettiah Muffasil, District- West Champaran. 2.

Arjun Das @ Arjun Prasad S/o Late Yamuna Das Resident of VillageSingha Chhapar, P.S.- Bettiah Muffasil, District- West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Parmanand Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 22-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 342, 323, 324, 356, 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioners are said to have killed the daughter of the informant and disappeared her dead body.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent, not named in the FIR and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that during investigation and on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18599 of 2022(3) dt.22-09-2022 2/2 the confessional statement of the co-accused, petitioners have been made accused in the present case. He submits that similarly situated co-accused has already been granted bail by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 11.07.2022 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 3028 of 2022. He further submits that petitioners have four criminal antecedents as stated in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Bagaha P.S. Case No. 10 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) ajay/- U T