Patna High CourtCR. MISC./54962/2017bail granted

Harendra Prasad @ Harindra Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

2017-11-17Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54962 of 2017 (2) dt.17-11-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.54962 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -86 Year- 2017 Thana -SHIWAPATHI District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================

1. Harendra Prasad @ Harindra Prasad, Son of Late Mohan Prasad, Resident of Village- Banghara, P.S.- Siwaipatti, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar. null null .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Naresh Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Surendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 17-11-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Siwaipatti P.S. Case No. 86 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 272 and 273/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is of recovery of 5 litres of royal stag wine, 35 litres of jerkins and 5 litres spirit and some empty liquor bottles and other articles.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this and nothing has been recovered from his conscious possession rather recovery was made from the Aangan of one Malik Prasad. Further petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 21.07.2017.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54962 of 2017 (2) dt.17-11-2017 Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise Act, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Siwaipatti P.S. Case No. 86 of 2017, subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T