← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/8805/2012dismissed

M/S Watson Health Care Pvt.Ltd v. Union Of India And ORS

2016-05-05Mr. Justice Vikash Jain1 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.8805 of 2012 (5) dt.05-05-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8805 of 2012 ====================================================== M/s Watson Health Care Pvt. Ltd., Plot No.95, Road No.2, S. K. Nagar, P.S.- Budha Colony, Distt- Patna through its Managing Director Shiv Kumar Bhagat .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare Government of India, Indian Red Cross Building , Red Cross Road, New Delhi

2. Indian Medicines Pharmaceutical Corporation Ltd (A Government Of India Enterprises) at Mohan, Distt- Almora, Uttrakhand through its Managing Director

3. Marketing Manager , Indian Medicines Pharmaceutical Corporation Ltd. (A Government Of India Enterprises ) at Mohan, Distt- Almora, Uttrakhand

4. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Health Government Of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna

5. Executive Director , State Health Society Bihar Pariwar Kalyan Bhawan Patna-15

6. State Program Officer (Aush) State Health Society Bihar Pariwar Kalyan Bhawan Patna-15

7. M/S Reliance Bulk Drugs & Formulations Ltd., through Managing Director S-Block 192, 1st Floor, Greater Kailash Part-1, New Delhi-48 .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. K.K. Sinha, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 05-05-2016 Despite repeated calls no one appears on behalf of the petitioner.

2. Learned counsel for the respondent State Health Society states that the writ petition is not maintainable as the petitioner had no privity of contract with the respondent Society rather it was acting in terms of an arrangement with respondent no. 7 as evident from para-6 of the writ petition.

3. Be that as it may, in view of non-appearance of the petitioner to press the writ petition, the same is dismissed for nonprosecution. (Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/- U