← Library
Patna High CourtCR. WJC/30/2021disposed

Nathuni Yadav v. The State Of Bihar, Through The Director General Of Police, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

2022-06-23Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.30 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-654 Year-2019 Thana- SUPAUL District- Supaul ====================================================== Nathuni Yadav Son Of Bhuvan Yadav Resident Of Village - Sukaila Ward No. -1, Ghuran, P.S. And District- Supaul, District- Supaul, State - Bihar ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar, Through The Director General Of Police, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Superintendent of Police, Supaul 3.

The Deputy - Superintendent of Police, Supaul 4.

The S.H.O of Supaul Police Station, District- Supaul 5.

The Investigating Officer of Supaul Police Station Case No. 33/2020 6.

Punam Kumari Wife of Jay Prakash Yadav Resident of Village - Nagar Parishad Ward No.1, P.O., P.S. and District- Supaul, State - Bihar-852131 ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amar Nath Yadav, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Saroj Kumar Sharma, AC to AAG-3 For the Informant :

Mr. Amrit Abhijat, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 23-06-2022 In view of the subsequent developments whereunder the Police has already submitted a chargesheet against the petitioner and order taking cognizance and the issuance of summons has already been passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to challenge the order taking cognizance and issuance of summon as may be advised to the petitioner in appropriate jurisdiction. Permission is granted.

Learned counsel for the informant and Mr. Saroj

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.30 of 2021(2) dt.23-06-2022 2/2 Kumar Sharma, learned AC to AAG-3 for the State are present. The application is, thus, disposed of with liberty to the petitioner as prayed for.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) SUSHMA2/- U T Note: The ordersheet duly signed has been attached with the record. However, in view of the present arrangements, during Pandemic period all concerned shall act on the basis of the copy of the order uploaded on the High Court website under the heading 'Judicial Orders Passed During The Pandemic Period'.