Suresh Prasad Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19714 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-180 Year-2012 Thana- KISHUNPUR District- Supaul ====================================================== 1.

SURESH PRASAD YADAV Son of Late Saryug Yadav Resident of Village - Sisouni, P.s.- Kishanpur, Distt.- Supaul.

2.

Anuj Kumar Son of Baleshwar Yadav Resident of Village - Sisouni, P.s.- Kishanpur, Distt.- Supaul.

3.

Krishna Kumar Son of Baleshwar Yadav Resident of Village - Sisouni, P.s.- Kishanpur, Distt.- Supaul.

4.

Amit Kumar Son of Hari Narayan Yadav Resident of Village - Sisouni, P.s.- Kishanpur, Distt.- Supaul.

5.

Rajesh Kumar Son of Hari Narayan Yadav Resident of Village - Sisouni, P.s.- Kishanpur, Distt.- Supaul.

6.

Anirudh Yadav Son of Late Shanti Yadav Resident of Village - Sisouni, P.s.- Kishanpur, Distt.- Supaul.

7.

Pramod Kumar Son of Anirudh Yadav Resident of Village - Sisouni, P.s.- Kishanpur, Distt.- Supaul.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pramod Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh.1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 28-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Kishanpur P.S. Case no. 180 of 2012 instituted for the offence under Sections 353, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. As per allegation in the FIR, petitioners were creating hindrance at the time of appointment process for Anganbadi Sewika was going on.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19714 of 2022(2) dt.28-09-2022 2/2 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely been implicated in this case on the basis of mere suspicion. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners and no any witness has supported the prosecution story. They have got no criminal antecedent. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of anticipatory bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Kishanpur P.S. Case no. 180 of 2012, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Supaul subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) amandeep/- U