Karan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.52057 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -320 Year- 2017 Thana -BARAUNI District- BEGUSARAI ======================================================

1. Karan Kumar S/o Mukesh Singh, R/o Vill.- Pipra , P.S.- Ratanpur OP, District- Begusarai.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shubhesh Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Yogendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 10-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner is in custody since 16.09.2017 in connection with a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his name has been brought in this case on the basis of the confessional statement made before the police by co-accused Nikesh Kumar. He further submits that there has been no recovery from his possession nor has he been put on T.I. Parade.

Considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52057 of 2017 (2) dt.10-11-2017 2/2 like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai, in connection with Barauni (Refinary) P.S. Case No. 320 of 2017, subject of the following conditions:-

(1) One of the bailors will be his own relative, namely, father, mother, brother, sister and/or their wife.

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) Saif/- U T