Aman Panjiyar @ Aman Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.60852 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -123 Year- 2017 Thana -BAKHTIARPUR District- SAHARSA ======================================================

1. Aman Panjiyar @ Aman Yadav S/o Ranjit Paniyar @ Ranjit Yadav R/o Village-Ghoghsam P.S.-Simri Bakhityarpur District-Saharsa .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Diwakar Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Suresh Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR ORAL ORDER 20-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Bakhtiarpur P.S. Case No.123 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 392 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that three miscreants looted cash amount, mobile and a motorcycle of the informant on the point of firearm for which the present case has been registered against unknown. It is submitted that in course of investigation, two persons, namely, Chandan Sah and Rajbali Yadav were apprehended, who disclosed the name of this petitioner before the police. The stolen motorcycle and mobile were recovered from possession of coaccused Nagendra Yadav and Chandan Yadav and both have been

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.60852 of 2017 (2) dt.20-12-2017 granted bail in Cr.Misc.No.49688 of 2017 and Cr.Misc.No.40039 of 2017. This petitioner is in custody since 18.08.2017. The learned A.P.P. for the State opposed the submission.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of bail is allowed. The petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Bakhiarpur P.S. Case No.123 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) If the petitioner is found involved in future in similar type of allegation, the prosecution will have liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

Harish/- (Sanjay Kumar, J) U