Randhir Kumar @ Randhir Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18179 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-247 Year-2025 Thana- MANIYARI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Randhir Kumar @ Randhir Singh Son of Late Radhe Singh R/OSisauniprabodhi, P.S.- Sarai, Post- Sarai, District-Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Siddhartha Prasad, Advocate Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocate Mr. Om Prakash Kumar, Advocate Mr. Shantam Kriti, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Umanath Mishra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 25-03-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Maniyari P.S. Case no.247 of 2025 registered under section 304 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. As per the prosecution case, while the informant was returning from his shop on his motorcycle, it is stated that two accused persons on another motorcycle snatched the bag that he was carrying with Rs.55,000/ in cash besides other documents and escaped.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the FIR was registered against unknown. The petitioner was falsely
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18179 of 2026(2) dt.25-03-2026 2/3 implicated in the case in course of investigation on the ground of his criminal antecedents. Neither any incriminating article has been recovered from his possession and inspite of the petitioner having remained in custody since 24.9.2025, he has not been put on T.I. parade and chargesheet has been submitted in the case. The petitioner undertakes to cooperate in the case/trial and to abide by any condition which may be laid by this Court for his release on bail.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations in the FIR, the material that has transpired in course of investigation as is evident from the order of the learned trial Court, no incriminating article having been recovered from the petitioner's possession and chargesheet having been submitted in the case without putting the petitioner on T.I. parade inspite of his being in custody for six months since 24.9.2025, the Court directs the petitioner to be enlarged on bail in connection with Maniyari P.S. Case no.247 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18179 of 2026(2) dt.25-03-2026 3/3 VIII, Muzaffarpur on the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall remain properly represented on each date of the trial. (ii) In case the learned trial Court is of the opinion that the trial is being delayed due to non-cooperation on part of the petitioner, the learned trial Court may cancel the bail bond of the petitioner and take him into custody till conclusion of the trial.
(Partha Sarthy, J) Saurabh/- U T