Mushtaque @ Mushtak @ Md. Mushtaque v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20479 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-252 Year-2019 Thana- JOKIHAT District- Araria ====================================================== Mushtaque @ Mushtak @ Md. Mushtaque S/o Ali @ Alauddin VillageBhebhra Chowk Ps- Jokihat Dist- Araria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Gopal Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shaheen Begum ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 27-03-2024 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272, 273, 279, 427, 379, and 34 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 6.5 litres of liquor from a car.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and is neither the owner nor the driver of the vehicle. It is next submitted that he came to be implicated at the instance of Chowkidar with whom

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20479 of 2024(2) dt.27-03-2024 2/2 he is on an inimical term. It is also submitted that in majority of the cases, the police is implicating the accused persons through Chowkidar or local people but then submits that if Chowkidar was aware of the involvement of the petitioner in the occurrence then why he did not inform the police earlier to institute the FIR which further casts aspersion on the case of the prosecution. 5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Jokihat P.S. Case No. 252 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T