Md.Muzammil Hussain v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4680 of 2012 ====================================================== Md.Muzammil Hussain Son of Md. Inamul Haque Resident of Village Changarha, P.S. Korhobari, District Kishanganj .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. The Appellate Authority For Appeals Regarding Appointment of District Teachers, Kishanganj through The Member Sri Ram Lakhan

3. The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna

4. The District Magistrate, Kishanganj

5. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Kishanganj

6. The District Superintendent Of Education, Kishanganj

7. The Block Development Officer, Dighalbank, District- Kishanganj

8. The Block Extension Officer, Dighalbank, District Kishanganj

9. The Chairman, Selection Committee Of Primary School Teachers, Gram Panchayat Dhangara, Block Dighalbank, District Kishanganj

10. Md. Abdus Salam Son Of Md. Nezamuddin Resident Of Village Kathalbari, Police Station-Bahadurganj District Kishanganj .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Sinha For the Respondent/s : Mr. Jawahar Pd. Karn Aag4 For the State : Mr. Jitendra Kumar, AC to AAG-14 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-08-2017 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present application with a liberty to prefer an appeal before the State Appellate Authority, challenging the order dated 29.12.2011 (Annexure-8), passed in Case No.617 of 2009 by the District Teachers Appointment Appellate Authority, Kishanganj, which is under challenge, in this writ application. Permission is accorded.

The petitioner shall file an appeal within a period of

Patna High Court CWJC No.4680 of 2012 (3) dt.01-08-2017 2/2 thirty days from the date of the order and the same shall be disposed of within the statutory period, in accordance with law. It has further been pointed out by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was granted interim relief by this court vide order dated 16.03.2012. The petitioner will be at liberty to file separate application for grant of any interim relief, if so advised, during the pendency of the appeal, within a period of ten days from the date of filing of the appeal. The said application filed by the petitioner shall be disposed of within a period of twenty days.

With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present application stands disposed of.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Amit/- U