Megha Singh v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary (Home), Government Of Bihar, Patna

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.461 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-184 Year-2024 Thana- NAYAGAON District- Saran ====================================================== Megha Singh wife of Ankit Singh R/o -Abhishek Enclave, F. No. 302, Hesag Hatiya, Near Devi Mandir, P.S.- Thipudana District -Ranchi (Jharkhand) Pin Code 834003, presently Residing at Village -Dumri Bujurg P.S.- Nayagaon Dist.- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary (Home), Government of Bihar, Patna bihar 2.

The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna Bihar 3.

The District Magistrate, Saran Bihar 4.

The Superintendent of Police, Saran Bihar 5.

The Officer-in-Charge (SHO), Nayagaon Ps, Dist- Saran Bihar 6.

The Investigating officer, Nayagaon Ps, Dist- Saran Bihar 7.

Ankit Singh son of Anil Kumar Singh R/o -Abhishek Enclave, F. No. 302, Hesag Hatiya, Near Devi Mandir, P.S.- Thipudana District -Ranchi (Jharkhand) Pin Code 834003, ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Ashish Giri, Senior Advocate Mr. Rajat Kumar Tiwary, Advocate Mrs. Deepika Sharma, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Prabhu Narayan Sharma, AC to AG For Respondent No.7 :

Mr. Radha Mohan Singh, Advocate Mr. Devendra Narayan Singh, Advocate Ms. Vijaya Raj Laxmi, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI) 20-03-2025 Heard Mr. Ashish Giri, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Rajat Kumar Tiwary and Mrs. Deepika Sharma for the petitioner, Mr. Prabhu Narayan Sharma, learned A.C. to A.G. for the State as well as Mr. Radha Mohan Singh, learned

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.461 of 2025(3) dt.20-03-2025 2/2 counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent No.7.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, with a view to avail the alternative remedy, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.

3. Permission, as prayed for, is granted.

4. The petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.

5. It is clarified that we have not examined the case of the petitioner on merits.

(Vipul M. Pancholi, J.) (Alok Kumar Pandey, J.) Sanjay/- U T