← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./19094/2025bail granted

Bhajan Kumar @ Bhajan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-07-23Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19094 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-53 Year-2024 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Purnia ====================================================== Bhajan Kumar @ Bhajan Kumar Son of Shyam Mandal village- Soren, PsAkbarpur, Dist- Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ram Prawesh Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Humayou Ahmad Khan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 23-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 53 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 127(6), 140(4), 143, 145, 64, 61, 352, 351(2) & 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 3, 4, 5 & 6 of the Immoral Traffic ( Prevention) Act, 1956.

3. The case of the prosecution is that one Phool Kumari Devi was apprehended with the petitioner in a hotel.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. He has got no criminal antecedent. It is also submitted that Phool Kumari has given her Statement under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. wherein she has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19094 of 2025(3) dt.23-07-2025 2/2 stated that she was known to the petitioner and that on his instance she has gone in the hotel for dining. She along with petitioner was apprehended. It is also pertinent to note here that the victim is major and she is also having three children. It is further submitted that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 10.10.2024.

5. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 53 of 2024.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) P. Kumar U T