Surendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55045 of 2017 (2) dt.20-11-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.55045 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -137 Year- 2016 Thana -KAUAKOL District- NAWADA ======================================================

1. Surendra Yadav S/o Late Kuldip Yadav Resident of Village Badraji, P.S. Kauakol, District Nawada.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Deo Raj For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Yogendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 20-11-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Kauakol P.S. Case No. 137 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307 and 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner is father in law of the deceased and the allegation is of committing dowry death of the deceased. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is father in law and no specific allegation has been levelled against him rather only general and omnibus allegation has been made. Further he has been in custody since 12.06.2017. Learned counsel for the State as well as informant opposed the prayer for bail, however, they could not point out any specific allegation levelled against the petitioner in F.I.R. Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55045 of 2017 (2) dt.20-11-2017 bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM -IV, Nawada, in connection with Kauakol P.S. Case No. 137 of 2016, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T