Patna High CourtCR. MISC./60111/2017bail granted

Rohit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-12-14Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.60111 of 2017 (2) dt.14-12-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.60111 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -245 Year- 2017 Thana -TURKAULIYA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Rohit Kumar S/o Shatrughan Prasad @ Shatrudhan Ram, R/o village Baluwa,Chowk Gopalpur, Motihari Town, District- East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pravin Kumar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 14-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 16.06.2017 in connection with Turkauliya P.S. Case No. 245 of 2017 for the alleged offences under Sections 457 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated on mere suspicion in connection with theft in the house of the informant. The petitioner was neither arrested on the spot nor recovery of any stolen articles has been made from the conscious possession of the petitioner, whose name transpired in course of investigation. Similarly situated co-accused Rahul Rana has been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 49521 of 2017. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.60111 of 2017 (2) dt.14-12-2017 of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Turkauliya P.S. Case No. 245 of 2017 on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/BT U T