Ankit Kumar @ Karu @ Ankit v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.37995 of 2018 Arising Out of P.S.Case No. -306 Year- 2017 Thana -GAYA MUFFSIL District- GAYA ====================================================== Ankit Kumar @ Karu @ Ankit, Son of Arjun Prasad, resident of Janakpur Near Sharda Lodge, Police Station Muffasil and District- Gaya. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manish Kumar No-2 For the Opposite Party/s : Smt Pushpa Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR ORAL ORDER 24-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is in custody in connection with Muffassil P.S.Case No.306 of 2017 registered for an offence under Sections 414 and 420/34 of the IPC and Sections 36AC/27(b)II, 27C, 27d, 28 and 28(A) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. As per FIR, the Drug Inspector of Gaya conducted raid in the house of the petitioner and seized a large number of spurious drugs manufactured by the petitioner for which no license was produced.

It has been submitted that the room from where the Drug Inspector seized the spurious drugs was let out by the father of this petitioner. This petitioner has/had no concern with the said

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37995 of 2018 (3) dt.24-07-2018 2/2 medicine. The petitioner, having clean antecedent, voluntarily surrendered before the court below on 01.05.2018. The learned APP opposed the submissions.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, prayer for bail is allowed. Let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM, Gaya in connection with Muffassil P.S.Case No.306 of 2017 with following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Sanjay Kumar, J) B.Kr./- U T