Veena Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13217 of 2016 =========================================================== Veena Kumari Wife of Prabhat Kumar, daughter of Jitendra Singh resident of village - Chipura Khurd, P.S. Gaurichak, District - Patna .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna
2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna
3. The Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna
4. The District Program officer, Patna
5. The Block Development Officer, Sampatchak, Patna
6. The Block Education Officer, Sampatchak, Patna
7. The District Teachers Employment Appellate Tribunal, Patna through the Secretary
8. The Secretary, District Teachers Employment Appellate Tribunal, Patna
9. The Gram Panchayat, Chipura Khurd, P.S. Sampatchak, District Patna, through the Panchayat Secretary
10. The Mukhiya, Chipura Khurd, P.S. Sampatchak, District Patna
11. The Panchayat Secretary, Chipura Khurd, P.S. Sampatchak, District Patna
12. Nita Kumari Wife of Bajrangi Kumar Singh, daughter of Bimal Kumar Singh resident of village Baruna, P.O. Chipura Khurd, P.S. Gaurichak, District - Patna .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Verma, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Priyadarshi Matri Sharan, AC to AAG-15 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 22-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the writ petition be disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to move before the State Appellate Authority against the order passed by the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, Patna dated 05.06.2015 in Case No. 80 of 2014.
Patna High Court CWJC No.13217 of 2016 dt.22-08-2017 2/2
3. Learned counsel for the State does not object.
4. In view thereof, the writ petition stands disposed off with liberty aforesaid.
5. If such an appeal is filed before the State Appellate Authority, within four weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed off on merits expeditiously and within the statutory period.
6. If any consequential order is required to be passed, the same shall also be passed within one month thereafter. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) P. Kumar AFR/NAFR U