Raj Kumar Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4644 of 2026 ====================================================== Raj Kumar Chaudhary S/o- Sri Laljee Chaudhary, R/o- Village- Daulatpur Dewariya, P.S.- Hajipur Sadar, District- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through District Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur. 2.
District Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur.
3.
Additional Collector, In-charge Law and Order, Vaishali. 4.
Superintendent of Police, Hajipur.
5.
D.C.L.R., Vaishali at Hajipur.
6.
Officer-in-charge, Hajipur Sadar, District- Vaishali. 7.
Nand Kishor Thakur, S/o- Late Laxman Thakur Resident of VillageDaulatpur Dewariya, P.O.- Sobhai, P.S.- Hajipur Sadar, District- Vaishali. 8.
Sukhdeo Thakur @ Dhanki Thakur, S/o- Late Laxman Thakur Resident of Village- Daulatpur Dewariya, P.O.- Sobhai, P.S.- Hajipur Sadar, DistrictVaishali. 9.
Shatrughan Thakur, S/o- Late Paltu Thakur Resident of Village- Daulatpur Dewariya, P.O.- Sobhai, P.S.- Hajipur Sadar, District- Vaishali. 10.
Virendra Thakur, S/o- Late Jugeshwar Thakur Resident of VillageDaulatpur Dewariya, P.O.- Sobhai, P.S.- Hajipur Sadar, District- Vaishali. 11.
Most. Kaushalya Devi, W/o- Late Jugeshwar Thakur Resident of VillageDaulatpur Dewariya, P.O.- Sobhai, P.S.- Hajipur Sadar, District- Vaishali. 12.
Most. Rajni Devi, W/o- Late Ramji Thakur Resident of Village- Daulatpur Dewariya, P.O.- Sobhai, P.S.- Hajipur Sadar, District- Vaishali. 13.
Laldev Thakur, S/o- Late Ramji Thakur Resident of Village- Daulatpur Dewariya, P.O.- Sobhai, P.S.- Hajipur Sadar, District- Vaishali. 14.
Sub Divisional Magistrate, Hajipur, Vaishali ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shivnandan Prasad, Sr. Advocate Mr. Mukund Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Addl. Advocate General (04) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 18-04-2026 Learned Senior counsel for the petitioner prays for and is allowed to implead the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Hajipur, Vaishali are party-respondent in the case in course of
Patna High Court CWJC No.4644 of 2026(2) dt.18-04-2026 2/3 the day.
2. Heard Mr. Shivnandan Prasad, learned Senior counsel for the petitioner and the State.
3. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s):
"for issuance of proper writ, order or direction to the respondent 1 set to provide appropriate machinery for measurement and demarcation of the properties of the petitioner as described in paragraph no.3 of this application and may be pleased to direct the respondent 1TM set to safeguard the petitioner in construction of a pucca boundary around the land of the petitioner described in paragraph no.3 of this application."
4. The matter relates with regard to the following land:
"R.S. Khata No. 236, R.S. Plot No. 726, 727, 728, Area 1 Khatha 19.5 dhur."
5. Learned Senior counsel for the petitioner submits that though the Title Suit No. 131 of 1993 was decided in his favour vide order dated 10th of August, 2004 and no appeal was filed thereafter, the disturbance continued.
Patna High Court CWJC No.4644 of 2026(2) dt.18-04-2026 3/3
6. At the outset, learned State counsel submits that the grievance that the petitioner is having can very well be agitated before the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Hajipur, Vaishali and not in a writ petition.
7. In the aforesaid background, the writ petition stands disposed of allowing the petitioner to approach the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Sadar, Hajipur (respondent no. 14) in next two weeks who shall be taking up the matter, issuing notice to all the relevant parties and it is expected that the matter will be taken to its logical conclusion at an earliest.
8. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of.
(Rajiv Roy, J) Adnan/- U