Guddu Raut v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20831 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-75 Year-2024 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Gaya ====================================================== Guddu Raut Son of Bindeshwar Raut Resident of Village- Gol Bagicha, Ward No. 16, Ps- Kotwali, Distt- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Aryan Singh, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Shahabuddin Azeem @ S. Azeem, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 18-03-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 75 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Section 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.
3. As per prosecution case, the police has recovered total 200 liter illicit liquor from the PIAGGIO tempo bearing Regd. No. BR-2F-5281.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged against him and has falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioner is neither the owner of the Tempo nor has any
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20831 of 2024(2) dt.18-03-2024 2/2 concern with the kept liquor and the real owner of the Tempo is one Chhotu Kumar. He further submits that nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been stated in paragraph no.3 of the present bail application. There is a non-compliance of Section 100 of the Cr.P.C. which creates a serious doubt in the prosecution case. The petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 14.01.2024.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Having heard rival contention of both the parties and considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case as also taking into account the period of custody of the petitioner and the petitioner having no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner, abovenamed, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 75 of 2024. (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) rishi/- U T