Patna High CourtCR. MISC./46790/2018bail granted

Ram Parekha Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

2018-08-13Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.46790 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -286 Year- 2017 Thana -BARAULI District- GOPALGANJ ======================================================

1. Ram Parekha Manjhi Son of Babuni Manjhi Resident of VillageBatardeh, P.S. Barauli, District- Gopalganj. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. S.K.Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 13-08-2018 Heard the parties.

Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in Barauli P.S.Case No.286 of 2017 registered for the offences under Sections 147, 304(B), 201 of I.P.C.

Allegation against the petitioner is of coming dowry death. Petitioner has been named in the F.I.R. but no relationship has been mentioned.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is co-villager of the deceased and, as such, no offence under Section 304(B) of the I.P.C. is made out against him. No specific allegation has been attributed against the petitioner.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46790 of 2018 (2) dt.13-08-2018 2/2 Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M.-XIV, Gopalganj, in Barauli P.S. Case No.286 of 2017 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. and (1) one of the bailors must be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court. (ii) the petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence and the petitioner shall co-operate in the investigation of the case and make himself available as and when required by the police, otherwise, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) AnilKrSinha/- U