← Library
Patna High CourtCR. REV./365/2019dismiss for nonprosecution

Ajit Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2024-12-09Mr. Justice Jitendra Kumar1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL REVISION No.365 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-299 Year-2017 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL District- Gaya ====================================================== AJIT SINGH Son of Pradhuman Singh Resident of Village- Lodipur, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Santosh Singh Son of Janardhan Singh Resident of Village- Mubarak Chak, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Gaya.

3.

Guddi Devi Daughter of Janardhan Singh Resident of Village- Mubarak Chak, P.S.- Mufassil, District- Gaya.

4.

Bimal Devi Daughter of Janardhan Singh Resident of Village- Mubarak Chak, P.S.- Mufassil, District- Gaya.

5.

Janardhan Singh Son of not Known Resident of Village- Mubarak Chak, P.S.- Mufassil, District- Gaya.

6.

Ram Lakhan Singh @ Bhola Singh Son of Umeshwar Singh Resident of Village- Mubarak Chak, P.S.- Mufassil, District- Gaya. 7.

Joga Singh Son of Late Chandeshwar Singh Resident of Village- Barat Police Station- Meskaur, District- Nawada. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Chandra Sen Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 09-12-2024 Nobody is present on behalf of the petitioner, however, learned APP for the State is present.

2. Despite several opportunities to remove the defects, learned counsel for the petitioner has preferred not to remove the defects as pointed out by the office nor he is present to attend the matter. It shows that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the present petition.

3. Hence, this case is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Jitendra Kumar, J.) ramesh/S. Ali/- U