Balmiki Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18281 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-483 Year-2021 Thana- DEEPNAGAR District- Nalanda ====================================================== 1.
Balmiki Yadav Son Of Sri Anuj Yadav Resident Of Village - Kalyanpur, P.S.- Deepnagar, District - Nalanda 2.
Dharo Yadav Son Of Sri Anuj Yadav Resident Of Village - Kalyanpur, P.S.- Deepnagar, District - Nalanda 3.
Chhotu Yadav @ Chhote Yadav Son Of Sri Anuj Yadav Resident Of Village - Kalyanpur, P.S.- Deepnagar, District - Nalanda 4.
Vimal Yadav @ Vimlesh Kumar @ Vimal Son Of Sri Dhuri Yadav Resident Of Village - Kalyanpur, P.S.- Deepnagar, District - Nalanda 5.
Manish Yadav Son Of Sri Sunil Yadav Resident Of Village - Kalyanpur, P.S.- Deepnagar, District - Nalanda 6.
Bachcha Yadav @ Rajeev Kumar @ Rajeev Yadav @ Bachcha Son Of Sri Arvind Yadav Resident Of Village - Kabeerpur (Kabeelpur), P.S.- Shekhopur Sarai, District - Shekhpura, At Present Residing At Village - Chakdilawar, P.S.- Deepnagar, District - Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Md.Imteyaz Ahmad For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Veena Rani Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 05-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 30(a),
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18281 of 2022(2) dt.05-08-2022 2/2 30(c), 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is no recovery from the conscious possession of the petitioners rather 60 liters of country made liquor and other utensil are said to have recovered from the place of occurrence. He further submits that petitioner nos. 1, 3, 4, 5 and 6 have no criminal antecedent whereas petitioner no. 2 has one criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application.
Considering the fact that the petitioners are the member of syndicate who manufactured the illicit liquor, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, their prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected in connection with Deepnagar P.S. Case No. 483 of 2021.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T