Patna High CourtCR. MISC./17220/2025bail granted

Suresh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-08-18Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17220 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-21 Year-2024 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== Suresh Kumar S/o Narayan Rangasawami Kumar R/o 14 3rd Class N.R. Mokalla Mysore, P.S.- Mysore, District- Mysore, Karnataka, Bangalore ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR PATNA ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sabal Kumar Jha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Harendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Kaimur Cyber P.S. Case No. 21 of 2024 dated 04.11.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 303(2), 318(2), 318(4), 319(2), 336(2), 336(3), 340 and 61(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 66B, 66C and 66D of the I.T. Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, one android mobile sets, two keypads mobile sets and three ATM cards of different banks were recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It is further alleged that the petitioner and the other accused persons are involved in the cyber crime.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17220 of 2025(2) dt.18-08-2025 2/3

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel has further submitted that one Kaushal Kumar is the master mind who brought the petitioner to Mohaniya for providing job but suddenly police came there and arrested the petitioner. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged offence. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 05.11.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Kaimur at Bhabua in connection with Kaimur Cyber P.S. Case No. 21 of 2024 with the conditions :- (i) The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17220 of 2025(2) dt.18-08-2025 3/3 without reasonable cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.

(ii) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offence in future, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T