Dhanjit Kumar Singh @ Dhanjit Kumar And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.31241 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -3 Year- 2015 Thana -SURSAND District- SITAMARHI ======================================================

1. Dhanjit Kumar Singh @ Dhanjit Kumar Son of Sujay Singh

2. Pravesh Kumar Singh S/o Rambabu Singh Both residents of Village - Raghunipatti, P.S. Sursand, District - Sitamarhi. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party : Mr. Abhay Kumar-I(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 15-10-2015 Heard both sides.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The informant named the petitioners along with others and alleged that they took his son Mukesh Kumar to their house for dinner. Sujay Singh and his wife Radha Devi came and informed the informant that his son was suffering from cold and sent to Sadar Hospital, Sitamarhi for treatment. The informant and his wife went there and found their son lying unconscious. The petitioners and others fled away from there. The son of the informant was referred to P.M.C.H., but during course of treatment Mukesh Kumar the son of the informant died. The post-

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31241 of 2015 (3) dt.15-10-2015 2/2 mortem report reveals that Mukesh Kumar died due to head injuries.

It is submitted that the informant alleged that Mukesh Kumar was poisoned, but no poisonous substance was found in the post-mortem.

It appears that the son of the informant had gone to the house of the petitioners for dinner where he sustained injuries and sent to hospital in unconscious state. The informant and his wife also saw him lying unconscious. The injury was found on head in the post-mortem report. The deceased got injury in the house of the petitioners.

Considering the facts aforesaid, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners above named on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J.) KKSINHA/- U T