Lalo Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17375 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-160 Year-2018 Thana- NAUHATTA District- Saharsa ====================================================== 1.

Lalo Yadav, aged about 55 years, Gender-Male, Son of Jiwachh Yadav 2.

Suresh Yadav, aged about 52 years, Gender Male, Son of Jiwachh Yadav Both resident of Village- Rasalpur, P.S.- Nauhatta, District- Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Sevak Choudhary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 26-03-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Nauhatta (Darhar O.P.) P.S. Case No. 160 of 2018 registered for offences under sections 363, 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

In the present case, an allegation has been against the petitioners of being involved in kidnapping of the victim girl for the purpose of marriage but, the statement made by the girl under Section 164 Cr.P.C. clearly reflects that she has entered into marriage with Bhawesh Kumaron her own will. Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17375 of 2019(2) dt.26-03-2019 2/2 or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Nauhatta (Darhar O.P.) P.S. Case No. 160 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also subject to condition that whenever the police will call the petitioners for investigation/interrogation, they will remain present and if they would not present themselves, the privilege of grant of anticipatory bail shall be deemed to have been canceled. (Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U T