Arvind Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.774 of 2016 =========================================================== Arvind Kumar, S/o Dani Singh, R/o Village- Pattal Bigha, P.S.- Hisua, DistrictNawada, Presently Working as Incharge Principal, Bhag Narayan Kanya Mahavidyalaya, Barauni, Begusarai, P.S.- Teghra, District- Begusarai. .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director, Secondary Education, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Munger, Division, Munger.

4. The District Education Officer, Begusarai.

5. The Bihar School Examination Board, Patna (Senior Secondary) Buddha Marg, Patna, through its Secretary, Bihar, Patna.

6. The Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board, Patna (Senior Secondary) Buddha Marg, Patna.

7. Dr. Kamini, Wife of Sri Jang Bahadur Kunwar, Resident of village and Post Office- Pidhauli, Police Station- Teghra, District- Begusarai, Ex-Incharge Principal, Bhag Narayan Kanya Mahavidyalya, Barauni, Begusarai. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Kaushalesh Choudhary For the Respondent/s : Mr.

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 11-07-2017 Re:-Interlocutory Application No. 4863 of 2017 The applicant in the Interlocutory Application cannot be added as a party at this stage as she had not filed the original writ petition and was not a party in the original writ petition. That being so, the Interlocutor Application is disposed of with liberty to the applicant to ventilate her grievance

Patna High Court LPA No.774 of 2016 dt.11-07-2017 2/2 independently, in accordance with law.

Letters Patent Appeal No. 774 of 2016 In view of the order passed today in L.P.A. No. 769 of 2016, the order dated 15.03.2016 passed by the Writ Court in C.W.J.C. No. 905 of 2016 has been upheld by us and we see no reason to make any interference into the matter. Finding that it is a dispute between the Managing Committee, if the learned Writ Court has directed for freezing the account of the institute and directed the parties to take recourse by approaching the Civil Court, no error has been committed by the Writ Court, warranting reconsideration. The appeal stands dismissed.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Shageer/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 14/07/2017 Transmission Date NA