Patna High CourtCR. MISC./17533/2025bail rejected

Pinku Kumar @ Pinku Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2025-04-08Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17533 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-149 Year-2023 Thana- KARAI PARSURAI District- Nalanda ====================================================== Pinku Kumar @ Pinku Ram S/o Late Laxmi Ram Resident of VillageSalempur, P.S.- Karai Parsurai, Dist- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Saurav Anand , Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Harendra Prasad , APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State .

2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3 . Prosecution case is that 05 liters chulai liquor were recovered from house of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case . The name of the petitioner transpired on the confessional statement of co-accused Veena devi (wife of petitioner ) who was apprehended on the spot. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and he is no way connected with the aforesaid

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17533 of 2025(2) dt.08-04-2025 2/2 recovery .

5 . Learned counsel for the State submits that petitioner has got 4 criminal antecedent and the alleged recovery has been made from the house of the petitioner. He further submits that petitioner is not entitled to the privilege anticipatory bail in view of Full Bench decision of this Court rendered in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. The State of Bihar reported in 2019(2) P.L.J.R. 1089 (F.B.).

6. Considering the aforesaid decision of this Court, this pre-arrest bail petition is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U T