Patna High CourtCR. MISC./47846/2018bail granted

Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2018-08-20Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.47846 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -211 Year- 2015 Thana -VAISHALI District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================

1. Vikash Kumar S/o Shree Durga Das, R/o Vill.- Kishunpur Mohini (Madhuban), P.S.- Kurhni, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prakash Chandra Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Suman Kumari Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 20-08-2018 Heard the parties. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with Vaishali P.S. Case No. 211 of 2015, registered for offences punishable under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. As per F.I.R., allegation against the petitioner is of theft of motorcycle, which have been recovered and another case has been lodged against the petitioner is of recovery of motorcycle and in that case, the petitioner has been remained in custody of more than one year.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and for the same occurrence two cases have been registered against the petitioner ( Annexure Nos-1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47846 of 2018 (2) dt.20-08-2018 2/2 and 2 ).

Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as discussed above, let the petitioner, above named on surrender or arrest within six weeks be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Vaishali P.S.Case No. 211 of 2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. with condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T