Sanjay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10544 of 2016 ======================================================
1. Sanjay Kumar S/o Sri Raghunandan Mehta Vill- Distt. - Raja Bigha, P.O.- Padrawan, P.S.- Jamhore, Distt.-Aurangabad (Bihar) .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, ford and Consumer Protection Department, Govt. of Bihar
2. The District Magistrate, Aurangabad
3. Yhe Sub-DivisionalOfficer, Aurangabad
4. The District Certificate Officer, Aurangabad
5. The Bihar State Food and Civil Supply Corporation Limited, through its Managing Director 5th Floor Sone Bhawan, Patna-800001
6. The Managing Director, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. 5th Floor Bhawan, Patna-800001
7. That District Manager, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd., Aurangabad .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kr Singh No. 6 For the BSFC : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh For the State : Mr. R.S. Singh, Ac to AAG7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 23-08-2017 Heard Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State as well as BSFC.
The petitioner has come with an offer to liquidate the outstanding dues as on today in three installments with the gap of three months each.
The petitioner is a miller and could not supply the requisite amount of CMR which led to initiation of a proceeding under PDR Act. Petitioner has received a notice for payment of Rs.30,11,583/- and he submits that he has
Patna High Court CWJC No.10544 of 2016 (3) dt.23-08-2017 already paid amount of Rs. 18 lacs. Rest amount he is ready to pay in three installments with the gap of three months each. In such view of the matter, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction that petitioner should liquidate outstanding dues as on today in three installments with the gap of three months each. But if the petitioner fails to pay the installments the Certificate Officer will be at liberty to take coercive action against him with respect to certificate case. With the aforesaid observation and direction this writ petition is disposed of.
(Shivaji Pandey, J) Vinay/- U