← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/9065/2021dismissed

Smt. Vidya Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2022-09-08Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9065 of 2021 ====================================================== 1.

Smt. Vidya Devi Wife of Bal Krishna Mahto Resident of village- Asurari Gachhi Tola, Asurari, Pipra Devas, P.s.- Barauni, District- Begusarai-851112 2.

Abhinandan Kumar Son of Bal Krishna Mahto Resident of village- Asurari Gachhi Tola, Asurari, Pipra Devas, P.s.- Barauni, District- Begusarai-851112 ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Begusarai 2.

The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms , Begusarai 3.

The Circle Officer, Barauni, District- Begusarai 4.

The Superintendent of Police, Begusarai 5.

The Sub Divisional Officer, Begusarai Sadar, Begusarai 6.

The Officer in Charge, Barauni Police station, Barauni, District- Begusarai 7.

Bablu Kumar Son of Late Kailash Singh Resident of village- Asurari Gachhi Tola, Asurari, Pipra Devas, P.s.- Barauni, District- Begusarai-851112 8.

Ramanand Singh Son of Late Sito Singh Resident of village- Asurari Gachhi Tola, Asurari, Pipra Devas, P.s.- Barauni, District- Begusarai-851112 9.

Yogendra Singh Son of Late Sito Singh Resident of village- Asurari Gachhi Tola, Asurari, Pipra Devas, P.s.- Barauni, District- Begusarai-851112 10.

Solendra Singh Son of Late Sito Singh Resident of village- Asurari Gachhi Tola, Asurari, Pipra Devas, P.s.- Barauni, District- Begusarai-851112 ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. P.N. Shahi, Sr. Advocate Ms. Deepka Singh, Advocate Mr.Sanjeet Kumar Singh, Advocate Mr. Shivam, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Sajid Salim Khan (Standing Counsel-25) For the Intervenor : Mr. N.K. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate Mr. Vijay Anand, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 08-09-2022 Though the present writ petition was filed for construction of a boundary wall over the raiyati land of the petitioners, however, it has been informed to this Court that during the interregnum period, the boundary wall has already

Patna High Court CWJC No.9065 of 2021(5) dt.08-09-2022 2/2 stood constructed, hence nothing survives for consideration in the present matter. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U