Ramesh Shah @ Ramesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20192 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-610 Year-2025 Thana- SUGAULI District- East Champaran ====================================================== Ramesh Shah @ Ramesh Kumar S/O Kapil Shah @ Kapil Deo Sah R/O Village- Sugaondih Ward no. 8 Sugauli, P.S- Sugauli, Distt.- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Dhannjay Kumar II, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Anish Chandra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 08-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 117(2), 110, 118(1), 303(2), 115(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3. As per the F.I.R., on the alleged date and time of occurrence, all the accused persons including the petitioner came at the house of the informant and started abusing. When family members of the informant objected, all the accused persons assaulted the mother and the father of the informant. It is alleged that petitioner assaulted the informant's mother with bamboo stick due to which she sustained injuries. The accused persons also assaulted the family members of the informant.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20192 of 2026(5) dt.08-07-2026 2/3 been implicated in the present case. Further submission is that both the parties are co-villagers and due to petty dispute, quarrel took place between them causing injury to injured. There is delay of two days in lodging the F.I.R. without any plausible explanation. Allegation of assault is against the eight accused persons including the petitioner. Although, petitioner has got four criminal antecedents but three cases have been lodged by his brother's wife and one case by his pattidar. Petitioner is on bail in all the cases. Petitioner undertakes to cooperate in the investigation and trial. There is no chance of absconding of the petitioner or tampering with the evidence.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposed the prayer for bail.
6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and nature of allegation, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Sugauli P.S. Case No. 610 of 2025, subject to
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20192 of 2026(5) dt.08-07-2026 3/3 the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita with further conditions:- (i) Petitioner shall co-operate in the investigation and trial of the case and shall remain present on each and every date during trial and in his absence on two consecutive dates, the trial court is at liberty to cancel his bail bond.
(ii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (iii) the petitioner shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bond. (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) utkarsh/- U T