Mukesh Kumar Singh @Mukesh Kumar @ Bablo Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15934 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-40 Year-2020 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Samastipur ====================================================== MUKESH KUMAR SINGH @MUKESH KUMAR @ BABLO SINGH S/O Umesh Prasad Singh R/o Muradpur Bangra Ward No. 03, P.S. Bangra, District Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bijay Bhushan Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ahmad Ali ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 11-06-2020 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State.

Petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with Excise Case No. 40 of 2020 registered for the offence punishable under sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to village politics. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that there is recovery from

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15934 of 2020(2) dt.11-06-2020 2/2 the hut situated on the land of this petitioner and, as such, he does not deserve to be granted the privilege of anticipatory bail.

Considering the nature of allegations levelled, the materials available on record and the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, this Court does not find it to be a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The same is, therefore, rejected.

(Arvind Srivastava, J) mcv/- U T